Efectividad de la inmunonutrición en el manejo nutricional perioperatorio del cáncer gástrico / Effectiveness of immunonutrition in the perioperative nutritional management of gastric cancer

Objetivo: valorar la efectividad de la inmunonutrición (IN) frente a las fórmulas nutricionales estándar en pacientes operados de cáncer gástrico. Material y métodos: se trata de un estudio de vida real, de tipo observacional, retrospectivo y de cohortes. Para este estudio se incluyeron 134 pacientes, todos ellos sometidos a gastrectomía en en el Hospital Montecelo, entre diciembre de 2019 y diciembre de 2022. El grupo A (N = 79 pacientes) recibió nutrición estándar y el grupo B (N = 55 pacientes) recibió fórmulas con arginina, nucleótidos, ácidos grasos omega-3 y aceite de oliva virgen extra. Este protocolo se ha realizado de forma pre y postoperatoria por un periodo medio de 10 días. Se evaluaron el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria, la necesidad de nutrición parenteral (NPT), las complicaciones postoperatorias y las variables antropométricas y analíticas. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron con el programa Stata 16.1.® Resultados: en el grupo de IN respecto al grupo de nutrición estándar: la estancia hospitalaria se reduce un 34 % (p < 0,001). La cantidad de pacientes que precisan NPT se reduce un 21,1 % (p = 0,022) y su duración también se reduce un 33,2 % (p < 0,001). El riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas es menor con la IN, concretamente un 70,1 % menos (p < 0,001). En cuanto a las otras complicaciones postoperatorias, la IN disminuye el riesgo de oclusión intestinal en un 84 % (p < 0,002), la dehiscencia de suturas en un 90,9 % (p < 0,001), la transfusión sanguínea en un 99,8 % (p < 0,001), el derrame pleural en un 90,9 % (p = 0,021), la insuficiencia renal aguda en un 84,02 % (p = 0,047) y la reintervención quirúrgica en un 69,93 % (p < 0,011). En el grupo de IN se observa una menor pérdida ponderal (p = 0,048) y una menor disminución de la albúmina (p = 0,005) y el colesterol postoperatorios (p < 0,001). Conclusión: la inmunonutrición reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias, disminuye la estancia hospitalaria..(AU)

Objective: to assess the effectiveness of immunonutrition (IN) compared to standard nutritional formulas in patients undergoing gastric cancersurgery. Material and methods: this is a real-life, observational retrospective cohort study. It included 134 patients, all of whom underwent gastrectomy at Montecelo Hospital between December 2019 and December 2022. Group A (n = 79 patients) received standard nutrition, and Group B (n = 55 patients) received formulas containing arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, and extra virgin olive oil. This protocol was carried out both pre and postoperatively for an average period of 10 days. The study evaluated hospital stay, the need for parenteral nutrition (PN), postoperativecomplications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.1.® Results: in the IN group compared to the standard nutrition group, the hospital stay was reduced by 34 % (p < 0.001). The number of patients requiring PN decreased by 21.1 % (p = 0.022), and its duration also decreased by 33.2 % (p < 0.001). The risk of infectious complications was lower with IN, specifically 70.1 % less (p < 0.001). As for other postoperative complications, IN reduced the risk of intestinal obstruction by 84 % (p < 0.002), suture dehiscence by 90.9 % (p < 0.001), blood transfusion by 99.8 % (p < 0.001), pleural effusion by 90.9 % (p = 0.021), acute renal failure by 84.02 % (p = 0.047), and surgical re-intervention by 69.93 % (p < 0.011). In the IN group, there was less weight loss (p = 0.048) and a smaller decrease in postoperative albumin (p = 0.005) and cholesterol (p < 0.001). Conclusion: immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications, decreases hospital stay, and optimizes nutritional outcomes.(AU)

[Effectiveness of immunonutrition in the perioperative nutritional management of gastric cancer]. / Efectividad de la inmunonutrición en el manejo nutricional perioperatorio del cáncer gástrico.

Introduction: Objective: to assess the effectiveness of immunonutrition (IN) compared to standard nutritional formulas in patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery. Material and methods: this is a real-life, observational retrospective cohort study. It included 134 patients, all of whom underwent gastrectomy at Montecelo Hospital between December 2019 and December 2022. Group A (N = 79 patients) received standard nutrition, and Group B (N = 55 patients) received formulas containing arginine, nucleotides, omega-3 fatty acids, and extra virgin olive oil. This protocol was carried out both pre and postoperatively for an average period of 10 days. The study evaluated hospital stay, the need for parenteral nutrition (PN), postoperative complications, as well as anthropometric and laboratory variables. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 16.1.® Results: in the IN group compared to the standard nutrition group, the hospital stay was reduced by 34 % (p < 0.001). The number of patients requiring PN decreased by 21.1 % (p = 0.022), and its duration also decreased by 33.2 % (p < 0.001). The risk of infectious complications was lower with IN, specifically 70.1 % less (p < 0.001). As for other postoperative complications, IN reduced the risk of intestinal obstruction by 84 % (p < 0.002), suture dehiscence by 90.9 % (p < 0.001), blood transfusion by 99.8 % (p < 0.001), pleural effusion by 90.9 % (p = 0.021), acute renal failure by 84.02 % (p = 0.047), and surgical re-intervention by 69.93 % (p < 0.011). In the IN group, there was less weight loss (p = 0.048) and a smaller decrease in postoperative albumin (p = 0.005) and cholesterol (p < 0.001). Conclusion: immunonutrition reduces postoperative complications, decreases hospital stay, and optimizes nutritional outcomes.

Introducción: Objetivo: valorar la efectividad de la inmunonutrición (IN) frente a las fórmulas nutricionales estándar en pacientes operados de cáncer gástrico. Material y métodos: se trata de un estudio de vida real, de tipo observacional, retrospectivo y de cohortes. Para este estudio se incluyeron 134 pacientes, todos ellos sometidos a gastrectomía en en el Hospital Montecelo, entre diciembre de 2019 y diciembre de 2022. El grupo A (N = 79 pacientes) recibió nutrición estándar y el grupo B (N = 55 pacientes) recibió fórmulas con arginina, nucleótidos, ácidos grasos omega-3 y aceite de oliva virgen extra. Este protocolo se ha realizado de forma pre y postoperatoria por un periodo medio de 10 días. Se evaluaron el tiempo de estancia hospitalaria, la necesidad de nutrición parenteral (NPT), las complicaciones postoperatorias y las variables antropométricas y analíticas. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron con el programa Stata 16.1.® Resultados: en el grupo de IN respecto al grupo de nutrición estándar: la estancia hospitalaria se reduce un 34 % (p < 0,001). La cantidad de pacientes que precisan NPT se reduce un 21,1 % (p = 0,022) y su duración también se reduce un 33,2 % (p < 0,001). El riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas es menor con la IN, concretamente un 70,1 % menos (p < 0,001). En cuanto a las otras complicaciones postoperatorias, la IN disminuye el riesgo de oclusión intestinal en un 84 % (p < 0,002), la dehiscencia de suturas en un 90,9 % (p < 0,001), la transfusión sanguínea en un 99,8 % (p < 0,001), el derrame pleural en un 90,9 % (p = 0,021), la insuficiencia renal aguda en un 84,02 % (p = 0,047) y la reintervención quirúrgica en un 69,93 % (p < 0,011). En el grupo de IN se observa una menor pérdida ponderal (p = 0,048) y una menor disminución de la albúmina (p = 0,005) y el colesterol postoperatorios (p < 0,001). Conclusión: la inmunonutrición reduce las complicaciones postoperatorias, disminuye la estancia hospitalaria y optimiza los resultados nutricionales.

Influencia del estado nutricional en la calidad de vida de adultos mayores con cáncer de estómago del Hospital de Guayaquil Dr. Abel Gilber Potón / Influence of nutritional status on the quality of life of older adults with stomach cancer at the Dr. Abel Gilber Potón Hospital of Guayaquil

Introducción: La calidad de vida del adulto mayor se deteriora a un ritmo acelerado por la presencia del cáncer de estómago, debido a los cambios internos o externos sufridos durante el proceso de esta enfermedad. Determinar el estado nutricional en adultos mayores con cáncer de estómago en la mejora de la calidad de vida en los pacientes que acude al Hospital de Guayaquil Dr. Abel Gilber Potón 2) Materiales y métodos: la implementada fue descriptiva, correlacional, con un diseño cualitativo, y semicuantitativo. La muestra está conformada por 70 pacientes del área de oncología del hospital entre las edades de 65 a 90 años. 3) Resultados: se encontró que el rango de edad es frecuente de 65 ± 70 años en un 41%; con respecto al sexo masculino predomina el 60%; en la etnia mestiza prevalece el 77%; en cuanto al índice de masa corporal se encuentra el 61% de bajo peso; el estadio B del cáncer de estómago según la valoración global subjetiva se presenta con mayor frecuencia; en base a la clasificación por estadios, el estadio IV es del 41,4%; el tratamiento sugerido fue de gastrectomía total en un 52,8%; cabe destacar que en la calidad de vida se identificó relación con el estado nutricional moderado en: dificultad para concentrarse 44%; depresión 64%; y pérdida de memoria 55%; dolor 56%: pérdida de apetito 64%; náuseas 64%; y diarrea 54%. 4) Conclusión: Se debe tener en cuenta que el cáncer gástrico es una neoplasia que genera una alta mortalidad y afecta la calidad de vida por lo cual se debe establecer una adecuada Dietoerapia de acuerdo con los requerimientos individuales del paciente considerando también las preferencias, la cultura y los efectos secundarios como las alteraciones organolépticas que se presentan por el tratamiento, además es importante el apoyo psicosocial del entorno.(AU)

Introduction: The quality of life of the elderly deterioratesat an accelerated rate due to the presence of stomach cancer,due to the internal or external changes suffered during theprocess of this disease. Objective: Determine the relationship between nutritionalstatus and quality of life in older adults with stomach cancerwho attend the Guayaquil hospital, Dr. Abel Gilbert Pontón,Guayas, January to September 2022.Methods: descriptive, correlational, qualitative and semi-quantitative study using the Screening carried out by Detskyin 1987, which measures nutritional risk, based on aspects ofthe clinical and physical history. To analyze the informationcollected, the Microsoft Excel 2016 and IBM SPSS Statistic Vprograms were used. 22. Kendall’s Tau C correlation test andKendall’s Tau B test (non-parametric measures) were appliedin order to establish conclusions. and validate hypotheses re-garding the relationship between VGS, stages and treatmentwith the nutritional status of patients suffering from gastricAC. The sample is taken from the population treated in theoutpatient clinic of the Guayaquil Dr. Abel Gilbert PontónHospital with a sample of 70 older adults with stomach can-cer from 65 to 90 years old.Results: When evaluating the nutritional status of olderadults with cancer through the subjective global assessment,it was found that 54% had stage B or moderately malnour-ished. Approximately 30% are found in stage C with malnu-trition, and 16% in normal stage A. When relating the nutri-tional status through the subjective global assessment andthe quality of life of the elderly with stomach cancer in refer-ence to the relationship nutritional status with the subjectiveglobal assessment, patient stages and patient treatment, allare statistically significant, with a medium negative correla-tion (tau = -0.436; p value.Conclusion: It must be taken into account that gastriccancer is a neoplasm that generates high mortality and af-fects the quality of life...(AU)

Cáncer Gástrico Bifocal con Linfonodos Negativos en un Paciente con Cirrosis Hepática / Bifocal Gastric Cancer with Negative Lymph Nodes in a Hepatic Cirrhosis Patient

El cáncer gástrico (CG), es la primera causa de muerte por cáncer, en hombres, y la tercera en mujeres, en Chile. No obstante ello, el CG bifocal (CGB) es una situación poco frecuente. El objetivo de este manuscrito fue reportar un caso de CGB, con linfonodos negativos en un paciente con cirrosis hepática, que fue intervenido quirúrgicamente; y revisar la evidencia existente respecto de sus características morfológicas, terapéuticas y pronósticas. Caso clínico: Hombre de 74 años diabético, hipertenso, insuficiente cardíaco y cirrótico; portador de CGB (subcardial y antro-pilórico), diagnosticado por endoscopia y con confirmación histológica de ambas lesiones; operado en Clínica RedSalud Mayor Temuco en septiembre de 2023. En el intraoperatorio se verificó además la coexistencia de una lesión de aspecto metastásico en el segmento III del hígado, y adhesión de la región antro-pilórica a la vesícula biliar. Se realizó gastrectomía total, linfadenectomía D2, esófago-yeyuno anastomosis término-lateral, resección segmentaria hepática (segmento III) y colecistectomía. El paciente permaneció 6 días en la UCI debido a que desarrolló insuficiencia hepática (encefalopatía leve y ascitis). Se alimentó vía enteral por sonda naso-yeyunal. Posteriormente inició alimentación oral progresiva, la que fue bien tolerada. Completó 11 días de hospitalización en servicio médico-quirúrgico, donde mejoró actividad neurológica, hasta su alta domiciliaria. Actualmente, lleva dos meses desde su operación, se encuentra en buenas condiciones generales, y el Comité Oncológico decidió no dar quimioterapia adyuvante. Se presenta un caso inusual de CG de tipo bifocal, respecto de lo cual hay escasa información disponible. Se logró realizar cirugía con intención curativa en un paciente de alto riesgo, con un resultado exitoso.

SUMMARY: Gastric cancer (GC) is the first cause of death from cancer in men, and the third one in women, in Chile. However, a bifocal GC (BGC) is uncommon. The aim of this study was to report a case of CGB, with negative-lymph nodes in a patient with liver cirrhosis, who underwent surgery; and review the existing evidence regarding its morphological, therapeutic and prognostic characteristics. Clinical case: A 74-year-old male patient with a medical history of diabetes, hypertension, congestive heart failure, and cirrhosis underwent surgical intervention for GC located in subcardial and antro- pyloric regions. The diagnosis was established via endoscopy and confirmed histologically. Surgery was performed at the RedSalud Mayor Temuco Clinic in September 2023. During intraoperative assessment, the coexistence of a lesion with metastatic-like characteristics in segment III of the liver was also verified, along with adhesions between the antro-pyloric region and the gallbladder. Surgical approach encompassed total gastrectomy, D2 lymphadenectomy, esophago-jejunostomy, segmental hepatic resection, and cholecystectomy. Subsequently, the patient required a six-day stay in ICU due to the development of hepatic insufficiency, characterized by mild encephalopathy and ascites. Enteral nutrition was administered via a naso-jejunal tube, followed by a gradual transition to oral feeding, which was well-tolerated. The patient completed an 11-day hospitalization period in the medical-surgical ward, during which his neurological function improved significantly, resulting in his discharge. At present, 2 months post-surgery, the patient remains in satisfactory general health, and the Oncology Committee decided not to proceed with adjuvant chemotherapy. This case represents a rare instance of bifocal GC, for which there is limited available literature. Surgical intervention with curative intent was successfully carried out in a high-risk patient, yielding a positive outcome.

Resultados del registro nacional de pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal candidatos a cirugía bariátrica (ReNacEIBar) / Results of the national registry of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease candidates for bariatric surgery (ReNacEIBar)

Introducción: El objetivo principal es realizar un Registro Nacional de pacientes diagnosticados de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) que son sometidos a cirugía bariátrica, así como evaluar los resultados y aspectos fundamentales del manejo de este tipo de pacientes en la práctica clínica habitual. Metodología: Estudio retrospectivo observacional multicéntrico nacional, en el que se incluyen pacientes diagnosticados previamente de EII, que hayan sido intervenidos de cirugía bariátrica desde enero de 2000 hasta diciembre de 2022. Resultados: Se han incluido un total de 41 pacientes: 43,9% diagnosticados previamente de colitis ulcerosa (CU), 53,7% de enfermedad de Crohn (EC), y una colitis indeterminada (2,4%). El índice de masa corporal (IMC) preoperatorio ha sido de 45,8 ± 6,1 kg/m2. Se han realizado 31 (75,6%) gastrectomías verticales, un (2,4%) bypass gástrico y nueve (22%) bypass gástrico de una anastomosis. Se han registrado 9,8% de complicaciones. A los 12 meses, el IMC medio fue de 29,5 ± 4,7 kg/m2, presentando en un porcentaje de peso total perdido (%PTP) de 33,9 ± 9,1%. Conclusiones: La cirugía bariátrica en pacientes previamente diagnosticados de EII se puede considerar eficaz en cuanto a pérdida de peso, y segura en relación con un porcentaje bajo de complicaciones.(AU)

Background: Our aim is to carry out a national registry of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent bariatric surgery, as well as evaluate the results and management of this type of patients in the usual clinical practice. Methods: National multicentric observational retrospective study, including patients, previously diagnosed with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2000 to December 2022. Results: Forty-one patients have been included: 43.9% previously diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 57.3% Crohn's disease, and an indeterminate colitis (2.4%). The preoperative BMI was 45.8 ± 6.1 kg/m2. Among the bariatric surgeries, 31 (75.6%) sleeve gastrectomy, 1 (2.4%) gastric bypass and 9 (22%) one anastomosis gastric have been carried out. During the postoperative period, 9.8% complications have been recorded. BMI was 29.5 ± 4.7 kg/m2 and percent total weight lost was 33.9 ± 9.1% at 12 months. Conclusions: Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be considered safe and effective.(AU)

División ganglionar posquirúrgica y su efecto en el recuento ganglionar y la estadificación en pacientes con cáncer gástrico / Postoperative lymph node division and its effect on lymph node count and staging in patients with gastric cancer

Introducción. La gastrectomía y disección ganglionar es el estándar de manejo para los pacientes con cáncer gástrico. Factores como la identificación de ganglios por el patólogo, pueden tener un impacto negativo en la estadificación y el tratamiento. El objetivo de este estudio fue comparar el recuento ganglionar de un espécimen quirúrgico después de una gastrectomía completa (grupo A) y de un espécimen con un fraccionamiento por grupos ganglionares (grupo B). Métodos. Estudio de una base de datos retrospectiva de pacientes sometidos a gastrectomía D2 en el Servicio de Cirugía gastrointestinal de la Liga Contra el Cáncer seccional Risaralda, Pereira, Colombia. Se comparó el recuento ganglionar en especímenes quirúrgicos con y sin división ganglionar por regiones anatómicas previo a su envío a patología. Resultados. De los 94 pacientes intervenidos, 65 pertenecían al grupo A y 29 pacientes al grupo B. El promedio de ganglios fue de 24,4±8,6 y 32,4±14,4 respectivamente (p=0,004). El porcentaje de pacientes con más de 15 y de 25 ganglios fue menor en el grupo A que en el grupo B (27 vs 57, p=0,432 y 19 vs 24, p=0,014). El promedio de pacientes con una relación ganglionar menor 0,2 fue mayor en el grupo B (72,4 % vs 55,4 %, p=0,119). Conclusiones. Los resultados de nuestro estudio mostraron que una división por grupos ganglionares previo a la valoración del espécimen por el servicio de patología incrementa el recuento ganglionar y permite establecer de manera certera el pronóstico de los pacientes, teniendo un impacto positivo en su estadificación, para evitar el sobretratamiento

Introduction. A gastrectomy and lymph node dissection is the standard of management for patients with gastric cancer. Factors such as the identification of nodes by the pathologist can have a negative impact on staging and treatment. The objective of this study was to compare the lymph node count of a surgical specimen after a complete gastrectomy (group A) and of a specimen with lymph node by groups (group B). Methods. Study of a retrospective database of patients undergoing D2 gastrectomy in the Risaralda section of the Liga Contra el Cancer Gastrointestinal surgical service, Pereira, Colombia. The lymph node count was compared in surgical specimens with and without lymph node division by anatomical regions, prior to sending them to pathology. Results. Of the 94 patients who underwent surgery, 65 were from group A and 29 patients were from group B. The average number of nodes was 24.4±8.6 and 32.4±14.4, respectively (p=0.004). The percentage of patients with more than 15 and 25 nodes was lower in group A than in group B (27 vs 57, p=0.432 and 19 vs 24, p=0.014). The average number of patients with a nodal ratio less than 0.2 was higher in group B (72.4% vs 55.4%, p=0.119). Conclusions. The results of our study showed that a division by lymph node groups prior to the evaluation of the specimen by the pathology service increases the lymph node count and allows the prognosis of patients to be accurately established, having a positive impact on their staging, to avoid overtreatment.

Results of the national registry of patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease candidates for bariatric surgery (ReNacEIBar).

BACKGROUND: Our aim is to carry out a national registry of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who underwent bariatric surgery, as well as evaluate the results and management of this type of patients in the usual clinical practice. METHODS: National multicentric observational retrospective study, including patients, previously diagnosed with IBD who underwent bariatric surgery from January 2000 to December 2022. RESULTS: Forty-one patients have been included: 43,9% previously diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, 57,3% Crohn's disease, and an indeterminate colitis (2,4%). The preoperative BMI was 45.8 ± 6,1 kg/m2. Among the bariatric surgeries, 31 (75,6%) sleeve gastrectomy, 1 (2,4%) gastric bypass and 9 (22%) one anastomosis gastric have been carried out. During the postoperative period, 9.8% complications have been recorded. BMI was 29,5 ± 4,7 kg/m2 and percent total weight lost was 33,9 ± 9,1% at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: Bariatric surgery in patients with inflammatory bowel disease can be considered safe and effective.

Enfrentamiento ante filtraciones de la esófagoyeyuno anastomosis

La filtración de la esófagoyeyuno anastomosis (FEYA) es una de las complicaciones más graves tras una gastrectomía total, ya que se asocia a un aumento de la morbimortalidad quirúrgica. El manejo óptimo de la FEYA aún es controversial, existiendo cada vez más opciones mínimamente invasivas, especialmente endoscópicas. El objetivo de la presente revisión es comparar la evidencia científica publicada y actualizada referente al tratamiento médico, endoscópico y quirúrgico de una FEYA y sus resultados a corto y largo plazo además de proponer un algoritmo de manejo que permita orientar la práctica clínica. Finalmente se presenta la experiencia nacional en relación a los avances presentados en los últimos años en torno manejo clínico de FEYA.

Leakage of the esophagojejunostomy (LEY) is one of the most serious complications after total gastrectomy, as it is associated with increased surgical morbidity and mortality. The optimal management of LEY is still controversial, with increasing minimally invasive options, especially endoscopic ones. The aim of this review is to compare the published and updated scientific evidence regarding the medical, endoscopic and surgical treatment of LEY and its short and long-term results, in addition to propose a management algorithm that allows guiding clinical practice. Finally, the national experience is presented in relation to the advances presented in recent years regarding clinical management of LEY.

Barrett's esophagus and esophageal cancer after sleeve gastrectomy. Myth or reality?

Sleeve gastrectomy has become the most performed bariatric surgery technique in the world. This bariatric technique has been related to the appearance of gastroesophageal reflux and recently with de novo Barrett's esophagus. It is not clear that this leads to an increased incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In this review we analyze the current scientific literature to try to answer the true incidence of Barrett's esophagus and adenocarcinoma after sleeve gastrectomy, and whether these data should make us change the indications for this technique.

Anti-reflux surgery vs. bariatric surgery as anti-GERD and hiatal hernia treatment in obese patient. New surgical proposals.

The persistence of obesity favors the failure of the Fundoplication (FP) in the treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux (GER). However, the weight loss obtained with the performance of a Gastric Bypass (GBP) allows a good resolution of symptoms, without increasing the incidence of postoperative complications. All of this leads us to consider that while FP is the indication in patients with BMI < 30, in those patients with BMI > 35, GBP appears to be the procedure of choice. But there is still no position in the case of patients with a BMI between 30 and 35, although we must take into account that an increase in GER recurrence has been described after FP in patients with a BMI > 30. Although Sleeve Gastrectomy (SG) is one of the most frequently used bariatric procedures in recent years, its association with a high rate of postoperative GER has led several authors to propose its performance associated with an anti-reflux procedure in patients with GER symptoms. Likewise, if the existence of an Hiatal Hernia is verified, it must be treated by hiatoplasty, both during the performance of a GBP and a SG. This simultaneous treatment is not associated with an increase in complications.

Possible technical aspects involved in the development of GERD after sleeve gastrectomy: Surgical technique considerations.

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is the most common bariatric surgery worldwide and has shown to cause de novo or worsen symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Esophageal motility and physiology studies are mandatory in bariatric and foregut centers. The predisposing factors in post-SG patients are disruption of His angle, resection of gastric fold and gastric fundus, increased gastric pressure, resection of the gastric antrum, cutting of the sling fibers and pyloric spasm. There are symptomatic complications due to sleeve morphology as torsion, incisura angularis stenosis, kinking and dilated fundus. In this article, we present recommendations, surgical technique and patient selection flow diagram for SG and avoid de novo or worsening GERD.

Detalles técnicos para prevenir la Enfermedad por Reflujo Gastroesofágico durante la Gastrectomía en manga

La gastrectomía en manga es el procedimiento bariátrico más frecuentemente efectuado en la actualidad. La complicación alejada más frecuente es el aumento de la tasa de enfermedad por reflujo gastro-esofágico. Se han descrito las razones anatómicas y fisiopatológicas de su origen. En este artículo se describen los puntos claves de la técnica quirúrgica de la manga gástrica para su prevención como también otros procedimientos que han sugerido tanto para su prevención como tratamiento.

Sleeve gastrectomy is the most frequently performed bariatric procedure today. The most common distant complication is the increased rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease. The anatomical and pathophysiological reasons for its origin have been described. This article describes the key points of the gastric sleeve surgical technique for its prevention as well as other procedures that have been suggested both for its prevention and treatment.

BRAZILIAN MULTI-SOCIETY POSITION STATEMENT ON EMERGING BARIATRIC AND METABOLIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES / POSIÇÃO DAS SOCIEDADES BRASILEIRAS SOBRE PROCEDIMENTOS CIRÚRGICOS BARIÁTRICOS E METABÓLICOS EMERGENTES

This Brazilian multi-society position statement on emerging bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures was issued by the Brazilian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (SBCBM), the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (CBCD), and the Brazilian College of Surgeons (CBC). This document is the result of a Brazilian Emerging Surgeries Forum aimed at evaluating the results of surgeries that are not yet listed in the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), the regulatory agency that oversees and regulates medical practice in Brazil. The Forum integrated more than 400 specialists and academics with extensive knowledge about bariatric and metabolic surgery, representing the three surgical societies: SBCBM, CBC, and CBC. International speakers participated online and presented their experiences with the techniques under discussion, emphasizing the regulatory policies in their countries. The indications for surgery and the subsequent procedures were carefully reviewed, including One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB), Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal with Sleeve Gastrectomy (OADS or SADI-S), Sleeve Gastrectomy with Transit Bipartition (SGTB), and Sleeve Gastrectomy with Ileal Interposition (SGII). The recommendations of this document are based on an extensive literature review and discussions among bariatric surgery specialists from the three surgical societies. We concluded that patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 kg/m2 may be candidates for metabolic surgery in the presence of comorbidities (arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes) with no response to clinical treatment of obesity or in the control of other associated diseases. Regarding the surgical procedures, we concluded that OAGB, OADS, and SGTB are associated with low morbidity rates and with satisfactory weight loss and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes and arterial hypertension. SGII was considered a good and viable promising surgical alternative technique. The recommendations of this statement aim to synchronize our societies with the sentiments and understandings of most of our members and also serve as a guide for future decisions regarding bariatric surgical procedures in our country and worldwide.

Esta declaração multissocietária de posicionamento sobre novos procedimentos cirúrgicos bariátricos e metabólicos emergentes foi emitida pela Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica (SBCBM), pelo Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) e pelo Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC). Este documento é resultado do Fórum Brasileiro de Cirurgias Emergentes, realizado com o objetivo de avaliar os resultados de cirurgias ainda não listadas no Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), órgão regulador que fiscaliza e regulamenta a prática médica no Brasil. O Fórum integrou mais de 400 especialistas e acadêmicos com amplo conhecimento sobre cirurgia bariátrica e metabólica, representando as três sociedades cirúrgicas: SBCBM, CBC e CBC. Palestrantes internacionais participaram online e apresentaram suas experiências com as técnicas em discussão, enfatizando as políticas regulatórias de seus países. As indicações para cirurgia e os procedimentos subsequentes foram cuidadosamente revisados, incluindo bypass gástrico de uma anastomose (OAGB), anastomose duodeno-Ileal única com gastrectomia vertical (OADS ou SADI-S), gastrectomia vertical com bipartição de trânsito (SGTB) e gastrectomia vertical com interposição ileal (SGII). As recomendações deste documento são baseadas em extensa revisão da literatura e discussões entre especialistas em cirurgia bariátrica das três sociedades cirúrgicas. Concluímos que pacientes com índice de massa corpórea (IMC) acima de 30 kg/m2 podem ser candidatos à cirurgia metabólica na presença de comorbidades (hipertensão arterial e diabetes tipo 2), sem resposta ao tratamento clínico da obesidade ou no controle de outras doenças associadas. Em relação aos procedimentos cirúrgicos, concluímos que OAGB, OADS e SGTB estão associados a baixas taxas de morbidade e com perda de peso satisfatória e resolução de comorbidades relacionadas à obesidade, como diabetes e hipertensão arterial. A SGII foi considerada uma boa e viável técnica cirúrgica, sendo considerada uma alternativa promissora. As recomendações desta declaração visam sincronizar nossas sociedades com os sentimentos e entendimentos da maioria de nossos membros e também servir como um guia para futuras decisões sobre procedimentos cirúrgicos bariátricos em nosso país e no mundo.

Morbilidad y mortalidad en pacientes llevados a gastrectomía por cáncer gástrico / Morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Introducción. El cáncer gástrico es la cuarta causa de muerte por cáncer a nivel mundial, con más de un millón de casos diagnosticados cada año. La cirugía con intención curativa sigue siendo el pilar del manejo para los pacientes resecables. La identificación de pacientes con mayor riesgo de morbimortalidad es importante para el proceso de toma de decisiones, sin existir hasta el momento una herramienta ideal. La revisión y el análisis de la experiencia de un centro oncológico de referencia pueden generar información útil. Métodos. Estudio observacional de cohorte histórica, en el que se incluyeron los pacientes llevados a gastrectomía por adenocarcinoma gástrico en el Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Bogotá, D.C., Colombia, entre el 1° de enero del 2010 y el 31 de diciembre del 2017. Resultados. Se evaluaron 332 pacientes, de los cuales el 57,2 % eran hombres con edad promedio de 61 años. La mortalidad en esta serie fue del 4,5 % y la morbilidad de 34,9 %. El factor asociado con mayor riesgo de muerte fue la edad, con un HR de 1,05 (p=0,021). Se encontró un mayor riesgo en el grupo de pacientes con ASA mayor a II (p=0,009).El 17,4 % presentaron complicaciones mayores a IIIA de la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo. Conclusiones. En el presente trabajo las cifras de morbilidad y mortalidad son similares a las reportadas en la literatura. Solo la edad y la clasificación de ASA mostraron asociación con valor estadístico significativo para complicaciones postoperatorias

Introduction. Gastric cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death worldwide with more than one million cases diagnosed each year. Surgery with curative intent remains the mainstay of management for resectable patients. Identify patients at increased risk of morbidity and mortality is important for the decision making process, with no ideal tool available yet. Review and analysis of the experience of a referral cancer center may generate useful information. Methods. Historical cohort observational study. Patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma at the National Cancer Institute in Bogotá, Colombia, between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2017 were included. Results. We included 332 patients of which 57.2% were men with mean age of 61 years. Mortality in this series was 4.5% and morbidity was 34.9%. The factor associated with higher risk of death was age with a HR of 1.05 statistically significant value (p=0.021). A higher risk was found in the group of patients with ASA greater than II (p=0.009). The 17.4% presented complications greater than IIIA of the Clavien Dindo classification. Conclusions. In this study morbidity and mortality seem similar to those reported in the literature. Only age and ASA score showed an association with significant statistical value for postoperative complications

Proteína C reactiva y su progresión en el tiempo para la detección de las fugas anastomóticas / C-reactive protein and its progression over time for the detection of anastomotic leaks

Introducción. Las fugas anastomóticas son una complicación común y crítica en cirugía gastrointestinal, por lo que su identificación y tratamiento temprano son necesarios para evitar resultados adversos. El uso convencional con un valor límite de la proteína C reactiva ha demostrado una utilidad limitada. El objetivo de este estudio fue determinar la utilidad de la medición seriada de la proteína C reactiva en la detección de fugas anastomóticas. Métodos. Revisión prospectiva de base de datos retrospectiva de pacientes sometidos a cirugía abdominal mayor con al menos una anastomosis intestinal. Se midió la proteína C reactiva al tercer y quinto día posoperatorio. Las complicaciones se categorizaron según la clasificación de Clavien-Dindo. La precisión diagnóstica fue evaluada por el área bajo la curva. Resultados. Se incluyeron 157 pacientes, el 52 % mujeres. La edad promedio fue de 63,7 años. El mayor número de cirugías correspondió a gastrectomía (36,3 %), resección anterior de recto (15,3 %) y hemicolectomía derecha (13,4 %). El 25,5 % tuvieron alguna complicación postoperatoria y el 32,5 % (n=13) presentaron fuga en la anastomosis. El aumento de la proteína C reactiva tuvo un área bajo la curva de 0,918 con un punto de corte de aumento en 1,3 mg/L, sensibilidad de 92,3 % (IC95% 78 ­ 100) y una especificidad de 92,4 % (IC95% 88 ­ 96). Conclusiones. El aumento de 1,3 mg/L en la proteína C reactiva entre el día de la cirugía y el quinto día fue un predictor preciso de fugas anastomóticas en pacientes con cirugía abdominal mayor

Introduction. Anastomotic leaks are a common and critical complication in gastrointestinal surgery. Their identification and early treatment are necessary to avoid adverse results, and conventional use with a cutoff value of C-reactive protein has shown limited utility. The objective of this study was to determine the usefulness of serial measurement of C-reactive protein in the detection of anastomotic leaks. Methods. Prospective review of a retrospective database of patients undergoing major abdominal surgery with at least one intestinal anastomosis. C-reactive protein was measured on the third and fifth postoperative days. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the area under the curve.Results. 157 patients were included, 52% were females. The average age was 63.7 years. The largest number of surgeries corresponded to gastrectomies (36.3%), anterior resection of the rectum (15.3%) and right hemicolectomies (13.4%). 25.5% had some postoperative complication and 32.5% (n=13) had anastomosis leaks. The increase in C-reactive protein had an area under the curve of 0.918 with an increase cut-off point of 1.3 mg/L, sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI 78-100) and specificity of 92.4%. (95% CI 88-96). Conclusions. The 1.3 mg/L increase in C-reactive protein between the day of surgery and the fifth day was an accurate predictor of anastomotic leaks in patients with major abdominal surgery

Gastroesophageal reflux management after vertical sleeve gastrectomy.

VSG is the most used surgical procedure in the world. Among the main complications linked to this procedure is GERD. It is apparent that endoscopic control protocols should be undertaken in all patients recovering from a VSG procedure. This is particularly key when taking into account the large number of patients suffering from GERD that show no symptoms, a situation that in many cases leads to severe esophagitis or even adenocarcinoma. Once the pertinent diagnostic tests have been carried out, the specialist should seek a conservative medical treatment including PPI. In the event that this treatment should fail, the next step to be considered should be a surgical procedure. In this case, the ideal procedure would be a reconversion to gastric bypass due to its low-risk and its results. There are other alternatives such as the Stretta, Linx or ARMS procedures; however, further research is necessary to prove their reliability.

Textbook outcome en cirugía gástrica oncológica, ¿qué implicaciones tiene sobre la supervivencia? / Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

Introducción: El textbook outcome (TO), o resultado de libro, es una medida multidimensional para evaluar la calidad de la práctica asistencial. Ésta viene reflejada como el resultado quirúrgico «ideal», atendiendo a una serie de indicadores o puntos de referencia establecidos que se adaptan en función de la patología quirúrgica que queramos analizar. Son pocas las referencias bibliográficas y las series publicadas al respecto, todas ellas muy recientes. Objetivo: Valorar el grado de cumplimiento del TO y su impacto sobre la supervivencia. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todas las neoplasias gástricas intervenidas en nuestro centro. Periodo: desde enero del 2015 hasta diciembre del 2020. Se determinaron los siguientes criterios TO: márgenes R0, > 15 ganglios linfáticos en el estudio histológico, sin complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa), estancia hospitalaria < 21 días, no presentar mortalidad en los 30 días posoperatorios ni readmisión durante esos 30 días. Se realizó un análisis comparativo entre el grupo de TO vs. grupo no TO. Resultados: Se intervinieron 93 pacientes. Alcanzamos el TO en un 34,1% de los pacientes. La variable > 15 ganglios linfáticos fue la que más afectó a conseguir un TO Al realizar el análisis de supervivencia, observamos que el grupo en que se obtuvo el TO presentó mayor supervivencia (p < 0,008). Conclusión: En nuestra serie, la obtención del TO tiene impacto sobre la supervivencia con un grado de cumplimiento del 34,1%. (AU)

Introduction: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the “ideal” surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. Objective: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. Method: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. Period: January 2015 - December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, > 15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. Results: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable > 15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). Conclusion: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance. (AU)

Textbook outcome en cirugía gástrica oncológica, ¿qué implicaciones tiene sobre la supervivencia? / Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

Introducción: El textbook outcome (TO), o resultado de libro, es una medida multidimensional para evaluar la calidad de la práctica asistencial. Ésta viene reflejada como el resultado quirúrgico «ideal», atendiendo a una serie de indicadores o puntos de referencia establecidos que se adaptan en función de la patología quirúrgica que queramos analizar. Son pocas las referencias bibliográficas y las series publicadas al respecto, todas ellas muy recientes. Objetivo: Valorar el grado de cumplimiento del TO y su impacto sobre la supervivencia. Método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de todas las neoplasias gástricas intervenidas en nuestro centro. Periodo: desde enero del 2015 hasta diciembre del 2020. Se determinaron los siguientes criterios TO: márgenes R0, > 15 ganglios linfáticos en el estudio histológico, sin complicaciones mayores (Clavien-Dindo > IIIa), estancia hospitalaria < 21 días, no presentar mortalidad en los 30 días posoperatorios ni readmisión durante esos 30 días. Se realizó un análisis comparativo entre el grupo de TO vs. grupo no TO. Resultados: Se intervinieron 93 pacientes. Alcanzamos el TO en un 34,1% de los pacientes. La variable > 15 ganglios linfáticos fue la que más afectó a conseguir un TO Al realizar el análisis de supervivencia, observamos que el grupo en que se obtuvo el TO presentó mayor supervivencia (p < 0,008). Conclusión: En nuestra serie, la obtención del TO tiene impacto sobre la supervivencia con un grado de cumplimiento del 34,1%. (AU)

Introduction: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the “ideal” surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. Objective: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. Method: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. Period: January 2015 - December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, > 15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. Results: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable > 15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). Conclusion: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance. (AU)

Textbook outcome in gastric surgery, what implications does it have on survival?

INTRODUCTION: The textbook outcome (TO) is a multidimensional measure to assess the quality of healthcare practice. This is reflected as the "ideal" surgical result, attending to a series of indicators or established reference points that are adapted depending on the surgical disease that we want to analyze. There are few references and series published about TO, all of them very recent. OBJECTIVE: We present a series of gastric surgery from the TO perspective and we analyze its impact on survival. METHOD: Retrospective observational study of all gastric neoplasms operated on in our center. PERIOD: January 2015-December 2020. The criteria for TO were: margins R0, >15 lymph nodes in the histological study, no Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIa, hospital stay < 21 days, no mortality or readmission in the 30 postoperative days. A comparative analysis was performed between the TO group versus the non-TO group. RESULTS: 91 patients were operated on. We reached the TO in 34.1% of the patients. The variable >15 lymph nodes was the one that most affected to achieve a TO. When performing the survival analysis, we obtained that the group in which the TO was obtained had a greater survival (p < 0.008). CONCLUSION: In our series, obtaining the TO has an impact on survival which 34,1% of degree of compliance.

Brazilian multi-society position statement on emerging bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures / Posição das sociedades brasileiras sobre procedimentos cirúrgicos bariátricos e metabólicos emergentes

ABSTRACT This Brazilian multi-society position statement on emerging bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures was issued by the Brazilian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (SBCBM), the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (CBCD), and the Brazilian College of Surgeons (CBC). This document is the result of a Brazilian Emerging Surgeries Forum aimed at evaluating the results of surgeries that are not yet listed in the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), the regulatory agency that oversees and regulates medical practice in Brazil. The Forum integrated more than 400 specialists and academics with extensive knowledge about bariatric and metabolic surgery, representing the three surgical societies: SBCBM, CBC, and CBCD. International speakers participated online and presented their experiences with the techniques under discussion, emphasizing the regulatory policies in their countries. The indications for surgery and the subsequent procedures were carefully reviewed, including one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S or OADS), sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SGTB), and sleeve gastrectomy with ileal interposition (SGII). The recommendations of this document are based on an extensive literature review and discussions among bariatric surgery specialists from the three surgical societies. We concluded that patients with a body mass index over 30 kg/m2 may be candidates for metabolic surgery in the presence of comorbidities (arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes) with no response to clinical treatment of obesity or in the control of other associated diseases. Regarding the surgical procedures, we concluded that OAGB, OADS, and SGTB are associated with low morbidity rates, satisfactory weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes and arterial hypertension. SGII was considered a good and viable promising surgical alternative technique. The recommendations of this statement aim to synchronize our societies with the sentiments and understandings of most of our members and also serve as a guide for future decisions regarding bariatric surgical procedures in our country and worldwide.

RESUMO Esta declaração multissocietária de posicionamento sobre novos procedimentos cirúrgicos bariátricos e metabólicos emergentes foi emitida pela Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Bariátrica e Metabólica (SBCBM), pelo Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgia Digestiva (CBCD) e pelo Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões (CBC). Este documento é resultado do Fórum Brasileiro de Cirurgias Emergentes, realizado com o objetivo de avaliar os resultados de cirurgias ainda não listadas no Conselho Federal de Medicina (CFM), órgão regulador que fiscaliza e regulamenta a prática médica no Brasil. O Fórum integrou mais de 400 especialistas e acadêmicos com amplo conhecimento sobre cirurgia bariátrica e metabólica, representando as três sociedades cirúrgicas: SBCBM, CBC e CBCD. Palestrantes internacionais participaram online e apresentaram suas experiências com as técnicas em discussão, enfatizando as políticas regulatórias de seus países. As indicações para cirurgia e os procedimentos subsequentes foram cuidadosamente revisados, incluindo bypass gástrico de uma anastomose (OAGB), anastomose duodeno-Ileal única com gastrectomia vertical (OADS ou SADI-S), gastrectomia vertical com bipartição de trânsito (SGTB) e gastrectomia vertical com interposição ileal (SGII). As recomendações deste documento são baseadas em extensa revisão da literatura e discussões entre especialistas em cirurgia bariátrica das três sociedades cirúrgicas. Concluímos que pacientes com índice de massa corpórea (IMC) acima de 30 kg/m2 podem ser candidatos à cirurgia metabólica na presença de comorbidades (hipertensão arterial e diabetes tipo 2), sem resposta ao tratamento clínico da obesidade ou no controle de outras doenças associadas. Em relação aos procedimentos cirúrgicos, concluímos que OAGB, OADS e SGTB estão associados a baixas taxas de morbidade e com perda de peso satisfatória e resolução de comorbidades relacionadas à obesidade, como diabetes e hipertensão arterial. A SGII foi considerada uma boa e viável técnica cirúrgica, sendo considerada uma alternativa promissora. As recomendações desta declaração visam sincronizar nossas sociedades com os sentimentos e entendimentos da maioria de nossos membros e também servir como um guia para futuras decisões sobre procedimentos cirúrgicos bariátricos em nosso país e no mundo.